Moez Echargui vs Diogo Marques Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Jul at 06:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Echargui vs D. Marques

TUN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

POR
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Echargui 2 - 0 Marques
They have played 5 sets in total, with Moez Echargui winning 4 and Diogo Marques winning 1. The last match between Moez Echargui and Diogo Marques was at the Porto Challenger, 28-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Moez Echargui getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Echargui | 2 |
| Marques | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Porto Challenger(07-28-25)
(R2) M25 Loule(03-21-25)
M. Echargui vs D. Marques H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $6,390 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.40% (379-259) | Career Total W/L | 47.06% (72-81) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 17 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 80.00% (4-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Echargui vs D. Marques Match Preview:
- Regarding second serve performance, Marques has a slight edge with a win rate of 43.98%, compared to Echargui's 43.69%. Which player might leverage this minor advantage effectively?
- In return games, Echargui leads with 45.19% of points won on opponents' second serves and 29.21% on first serves, while Marques trails with 43.01% and 27.24%, respectively. Could Echargui's stronger return game decide the match in his favor?
- Under pressure, Echargui has been more effective, saving 55.3% of breakpoints compared to Marques' 47.33%. Does this indicate a stronger mental fortitude in critical situations for Echargui?
- Performance overview shows Echargui with a significantly higher match win percentage over the last year, standing at 71.25%, while Marques has won just 28.57% of his matches. Is this overall superior track record a decisive factor?
- On favorite surfaces, Marques performs best on clay with a 50% win rate, whereas Echargui excels on hard courts with 65% wins. Considering that their last match on hard was won by Echargui, might this surface preference play a crucial role?
- Both players primarily compete at the same tournament level, but Echargui has a higher win rate of 76.79% in these events over the last year, whereas Marques has managed only 30.56%. Could Echargui's success at this competitive level suggest he's better prepared?
- In their direct head-to-head encounters, Echargui has won their only past match, suggesting a psychological advantage. Does this victory impact potential outcomes?
- Despite Marques winning 54% of deciding sets against Echargui's 53% over the past year, Echargui took the only deciding set in their previous head-to-head, highlighting perhaps a psychological edge.
- In break point opportunities, Echargui has a higher conversion rate of 40.82%, while Marques converts 37.5%. Does Echargui's edge suggest better execution under pressure?
Editorial Prediction (July 27, 2025, UTC):
The comparative analysis of Marques and Echargui's performance indicators reveals that Echargui holds several advantages. Despite only a slight lead in second serve points, his superior return game capability and breakpoint-saving skills suggest a more robust all-around match performance.
Echargui's commendable track record over the past year and his notable success rate on hard surfaces—where this match is set to take place—further strengthen his chances. This establishes Echargui as the more consistent and adaptable player.
The psychological edge from having previously defeated Marques, combined with a higher breakpoint conversion rate, suggests that Echargui is more likely to capitalize on critical moments.
Therefore, Echargui is predicted to be the likely winner for this upcoming tennis match.
Moez Echargui vs Diogo Marques Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Echargui vs D. Marques H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 18 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:52:3 | Average Match Time | 1:52:3 |
| 64% (100/157) | 1st Serve % | 60% (84/141) |
| 70% (70/100) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (55/84) |
| 54% (31/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (24/57) |
| 40% (8/20) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (4/16) |
| 44% (62/141) | Return Points Win % | 36% (56/157) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Echargui Recent Matches Played
D. Marques Recent Matches Played

M. Echargui vs D. Marques Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.40% (379/259) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.06% (72/81) |
| 57.94% (865/628) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.70% (163/186) |
| 53.16% (7388/6509) | Games Win/Loss | 48.65% (1609/1698) |
| 66.94% (241/119) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.52% (67/74) |
| 51.78% (131/122) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (5/5) |
| 28.00% (7/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1854 | Aces Total | 276 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1630 | Total Double Faults | 211 |
| 1:42:40 | Average Match Time | 1:5:2 |
| 501.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.64 |
| 59% (23928/40475) | 1st Serve % | 62% (3962/6429) |
| 67% (15967/23928) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2548/3962) |
| 49% (8177/16547) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1136/2467) |
| 44% (2138/4825) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (219/512) |
| 43% (17926/41644) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2324/6295) |
| 54.55% (6/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.56% (88/101) | Challenger W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
| 65.51% (283/149) | Futures W/L | 48.97% (71/74) |
| 60% (371/617) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (72/153) |
| 63% (5/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (92/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (21/37) |
| 53% (119/223) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (24/43) |
| 86% (368/315) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (68/59) |
| 14% (368/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (68/9) |
| 25% (269/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (85/13) |